![]() ![]() What is the consequence of all of this? First, govt created a problem where none existed. So why double standards at home & abroad? Hijab and turbans of the uniform’s colours can allowed to be wornġ0. When Ireland’s govt changed the rules for police uniform to allow hijab and Sikh turban, Modi govt welcomed it. What does uniform do to prevent teachers from discriminating? Globally, the experience has been that reasonable accommodations are made in school, police & army uniforms to reflect diversity.ĩ. How? Will kids not know who’s from a rich/poor family? Do caste names not denote background?Ĩ. The excuse being used is that uniform will ensure uniformity. ![]() Banning headscarf definitely harms devout Muslim women and their families as it prevents them from accessing educationħ. State should be allowed to interfere in religious rights only if such acts of worship harm others. Not even other people of the same religion have the right to decide essentiality. It is absurd that judges can decide essentialityĥ. For a devout Hindu Brahmin, janeu is essential but for a non-Brahmin it may not be. For a devout person, everything is essential & for an atheist nothing is essential. It’s time to review the essential religious practice test. Owaisi lists out why the HC verdict is against the act of worship:Ĥ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |